Back to library
GongGong

Live Partner QBR Simulation

Sales & GTM

What it tests

Ability to run a high-stakes partner conversation — diagnose underperformance, align on a joint plan, and hold a partner accountable without breaking the relationship

Format

  1. 1Candidate receives a one-page QBR brief 24 hours in advance: a named fictional partner, their last 2 quarters of data (pipeline, sourced revenue, co-sell win rate, enablement completion), and context on the relationship history
  2. 2Live 30-minute simulation: candidate runs the QBR with two interviewers playing the partner-side — a skeptical VP of Sales and a supportive partner manager
  3. 3The VP challenges the numbers, pushes back on the joint business plan, and floats the idea of switching to a competitor
  4. 4Debrief (30 min): panel asks what the candidate would do differently, how they'd document outcomes, and what their internal follow-up plan looks like

What to look for

  • Do they open with data or with relationship rapport — and is the sequencing intentional?
  • Can they hold accountability (missed targets) without becoming combative or overly apologetic?
  • How do they handle the competitor threat — do they panic, deflect, or reframe value?
  • Is their debrief plan concrete (specific next steps, owners, dates) or vague ('we'll follow up')?

Adaptation guide

Use your own real partner data — anonymized — for the brief. Brief the interviewers playing the partner on how far to push back. The simulation is most valuable when it's uncomfortable but not theatrical.

Full description

Format:

  1. Candidate receives a one-page QBR brief 24 hours in advance: a named fictional partner, their last 2 quarters of data (pipeline, sourced revenue, co-sell win rate, enablement completion), and context on the relationship history
  2. Live 30-minute simulation: candidate runs the QBR with two interviewers playing the partner-side — a skeptical VP of Sales and a supportive partner manager
  3. The VP challenges the numbers, pushes back on the joint business plan, and floats the idea of switching to a competitor
  4. Debrief (30 min): panel asks what the candidate would do differently, how they'd document outcomes, and what their internal follow-up plan looks like

Time: 60 minutes

What to look for:

  • Do they open with data or with relationship rapport — and is the sequencing intentional?
  • Can they hold accountability (missed targets) without becoming combative or overly apologetic?
  • How do they handle the competitor threat — do they panic, deflect, or reframe value?
  • Is their debrief plan concrete (specific next steps, owners, dates) or vague ("we'll follow up")?

Adaptation: Use your own real partner data — anonymized — for the brief. Brief the interviewers playing the partner on how far to push back. The simulation is most valuable when it's uncomfortable but not theatrical.